Search This Blog

Saturday, November 28, 2020

SHIFTS IN BRAIN DRAIN IN THE 21ST CENTURY

The skyrocketing demand and shortages in professional fields today can be attributed to the inordinate desire by developed countries to boost their professional fields, innovations and productivity. This has perhaps dimmed technological and professional advancement thereby depriving underdeveloped countries steady progress. Such a practice is technically referred to as Brain Drain. In a succinct way, Brain Drain is the emigration or flux of the smartest, educated people, scientists and technocrats from their native countries to work abroad motivated by promising high salary provisions and job security.

In 2000 almost 175 million people: approximately 2.9% of the world’s population was said to be outside their countries of birth for work (Maureen Gitate: 2013, 23). This “Human Capital Flight” poses a threat to the progress of countries which lose human resources, rich technical skills or knowledge. It has increased disparities in the economic and social prospects of countries across the world. The rich and developed countries on the contrary, grow richer and prosperous at the expense of developing countries which continue to stagger or stay backward. The disadvantageous part of brain drain in this millennium is felt in the economic costs which particular developing countries incur in training or educational funding of the future emigrant-skilled personnel who fail to do justice to the resources invested in their education by their native countries. Thus the countries which experience the drain of skilled resources face the getaway of financial capital and in turn, the GDP of developing countries keep fluctuating due to outflow of skilled human capital reciprocated with inflow of hired personnel in governments’ effort to replace the flown human capital.


Of recent, we have globally experienced new shifts in the problem. The once held outcry in various third world countries about theoretical studies with their inability to produce self-sustaining and job creating entrepreneurs has aggravated the menace of unemployment. It’s on record today that the lack of prior knowledge of the employer in a given labor market will tantamount into long years of unemployment. Moreover, in some places, it necessitates a job seeker to offer a bribe to attain a job, yet the female due to the lack of working ethics, the male employers have victimized the women turning them into objects of sexual gratification for their lust.

Technocrats on the other hand, being deprived of proper working environment, low salary enumeration, sabotage of their research and innovations, pressure and poor working conditions, many have resorted to fleeing their native countries in search for greener pastures. They have perfectly done well in various fields abroad. As incentives for work, their salaries are ever increased and both insurance and assurance are incontestable wherever they are.

The 21st century with its provisions has created a shift in the traditional conception of brain drain. Today we hear less of skilled personnel fleeing their countries. Companies in developed countries, taking advantage of the creeping economies of poor nations, have advertised demand for casual workers. The most heartbreaking fact of this is that poor people sell off their precious properties to secure a contract for two or more years hoping to elevate their economic standards. Many even after the sale, they still fail to secure a contract yet those who get such contracts work in dehumanizing conditions characterized by long hours of work, low payments, mistreatment, sexual harassment for the females and to the extreme, some have culminated into death due to the work load which is not in extension to their bodily strain or murdered by their employers. Thus I no longer consider “Brain Drain,” but rather; “Strain Drain”- a modern form of slavery.

Due to the heavy yoke laid upon humanity in this century, it’s no longer a problem to be dealt by individuals alone. There is a need for collective consciousness to remedy the situation. The individualistic, capitalistic and egoistic tendencies for personal enrichment at the expense of others need to be wiped out.

We need to remember that the existential inability of the other person to pursuit his living in a humanized manner simultaneously depict our spiritual immaturity. We mirror each other! Egoism which lure us into inhibiting our true selves is but for a little while. All religions therefore, ought to awaken the ethical and moral integrity of persons in their exhortations.

Owing to the globalism of the challenges brought about by brain drain and strain drain, particular countries ought to alleviate and nurse the situation. In the first place, education system which is predominately theoretical in nature need to be revised and more emphasis given to practical skills to equip nationals with skills of self-sustenance through job creation. Secondly, governments should strongly offer checks and balances in various sectors to mitigate against corruption and its manifestations. Finally governments should develop centers for scientific research and high tech entrepreneurship together with tax holidays for local entrepreneurs as a way of encouraging influx of national working abroad to invest in the economic and technological advancements of their nations.

 

Thursday, November 19, 2020

TRANSFORMING SUBJECTIVISM INTO OBJECTIVISM: A NEW LOOK ABOUT THE SELF

    Pope Francis in his Post-Synodal Exhortation Christus Vivit says: “often in life, we waste time asking ourselves ‘who I am?’ You can keep asking, ‘whoam I?’ for the rest of your life. But the real question is ‘for whom am I?”(Christus Vivit. 286). In this particular article: 286, the pope implicitly invites the entire People of God to have a new look at the “self.” Humanly speaking, the purposes of human existence is to build a good relationship with other human beings and helping others in various aspect of life towards an authentic attainment of the goal of life. In other words that there is a need for transformation from subjectivism to objectivism. 
     But first of all, what is subjectivism and objectivism? Before going any further, it’s right and just first of all understand the terminologies used to give a better understanding of the discretion entirely. Subjectivism and objectivism are actually the philosophical concepts though in this modern time due to lack of the proper understanding of whatever is entailed in them, problems more than solutions have arisen. Subjectivism in the first place is the doctrine that all knowledge is limited to experiences by the self, and that transcendent knowledge is impossible. Such a mentality hinder the reception of other ideas or exhortations from other people, which to the psychologists it’s termed as “wild ego” (Sigmund Freud; 1923, 56). 
     On the other hand is its opposite that is Objectivism. This theory is in contrast with the theory of subjectivism. It is the philosophical doctrine which emphasizes the belief that certain things, especially moral truths, exist independently of human knowledge or perception of them (Richard Bernstein; 1983, 8). It goes beyond the nose perception, that is looking at things one’s own way but through the openness of the mind to various reflections beyond the self. Hence, it does not take the presence of other realities for granted. So, this theory recognizes and values the existence of other beings. The famous saying “I am because you are” (Ubuntu: African Philosophy), will suit this theory. This theory is very important for human life because it focuses on a “beyond-oneself”. The importance of objectivism will be really felt in life, when the theory does not remain as a philosophical notion as such. It means there must be an application part taken by every human being. The theory will not bring positive impacts for life, unless it is being practiced. And this requires fully human understanding that objectivism yields great knowledge if we deeply contemplation about self and its relation to the truth. In fact, subjectivism has been dominating objectivism. This domination is clearly seen in today’s world, where human beings give more priority to individualism, egoism and selfishness.
    The world in which we live is one where everyone is for his own interests and this makes it a broken world; it is a broken world because it is characterized by instability, crime, war and ethnic intolerance which will prevent the world from developing or making progress (Gabriel Marcel: 1913). One of the reason sthat causes these unwanted events which stated by Gabriel Marcel is the subjectivism that some people still hold. They only think about themselves. In responding to those problems, Gabriel Marcel suggested to us to have a deep reflection about the being and open up to each other through communication and communion. 


    A relationship which is built by a communication and communion is really needed today. It shows the very nature of human that is social being. A good communion and an effective communication will also surely help every human being to have a good life. It brings people to a right understanding about the self. The self that is not selfishness or egoism. But a magnanimousness towards others: Being available for others. Therefore, transforming subjectivism into objectivism is necessary to be put into practice. Looking at today’s reality where there are many sufferings, poverty, and slavery, and dehumanizing relationships. Humanity is demanded to have a new way of understanding about self. It is to move from asking ‘who am I?’ which is ontological to a real question eschatological and existential question of ‘for whom am I?’ As the Christian family, it is essential for us to continue reflecting on the invitation of Pope Francis in his exhortation Christus Vivit article 286. It is an invitation that will definitely bring a big transformation for oneself and even the world in general.

Sunday, November 8, 2020

GOD IN THE MIDST OF SUFFERING

 In this modern world we are too busy. If a beggar asks for any alms we place some money and escape from the situation as early as possible. We don’t think why he or she struggles, what makes him or her to beg. We don’t find whether there are any other ways to help the person in need than dropping some money or giving some things to satiate their hunger or thirst. Moreover due to the Covid-19 pandemic panics and worries have affected indiscriminately both the rich and poor in same manner. All are quarantined in the four walls of their residents. 

 

A while past, I was put to task by friends of mine who pestered me with a traditional philosophical query of the Existence of God. One seemed to be affluent in strong arguments against God’s existence whereas another on the contrary, argued in defense of God’s existence as he said; ‘My God is a loving God, a caring God, and non-punishing God. Actually the second person is not educated or learned, but an enlightened ordinary faithful Christian. I was taken up while listening to it. So a question appeared in my mind: how are we to talk about God at this time of global suffering. This focus is very fruitful one to express the faith in the existence of God. 

The study of Theology talks about God, it says God is a Mystery and thus beyond our comprehension. St. Thomas Aquinas a great Theologian would state in his Summa Theologiae that “we cannot know what God is, but only what is not.” It is understood that the suffering is a massive reality and inevitable, but crucial to be more prudent while responding to the disquieting situations. In the Bible, we find Job who never wavered in his faith. He was with all the material facilities, comforts, and properties and had a good family leading a happy life. But due to the test, one after the other: his dear ones distanced from him and all his material possessions were taken away from him. He however at the moment of unjust suffering kept his head on the side of God, witnessed God alone saying, God has given, He has taken up ( Jb.1.21). 

The basic entry points for our situational reflection should be; how are we talking about God who is revealed as love? How are we proclaiming God of Life to men and women who die daily and everyday due to this COVID-19 globally? How do we approach and respect the people who are affected with this pandemic? These are some of the existential questions appearing in my heart thinking of God in the time of suffering.  

The Church is our mother who teaches the Christian faith. Theologically speaking it is the sacrament of Christ. Saint Augustine puts it in a very reflective way which suites our adherence to the Church as spiritual home and heritage, he contends; “He who does not have the church as his mother does not have God as his Father.” Our Catholic Church asserts our identity as Christian. We Christians are called to live in love and fraternity. In a situation like today we need to manifest the compassionate and merciful love of God. Pope Francis shows his compassionate heart to the world, with various gestures of love including praying to Mother Mary and Eucharistic Lord to bring an end to this suffering. He is asking the Christians to pray to God for the expiration of COVID-19 and solicits solidarity with the suffering people. 

As Jesus moved towards the people with compassion, thereby, healing them, strengthening them in the time of fear, he similarly hears the grieving of the many now. There are many compassionate people at the service, sacrificing their days and nights for the good of the others. We need to express our compassionate hearts wherever we are, because when we show compassion to others we show the compassionate love of God and tell the world that God continues to love hence, giving true witness to His existence in world which many have failed to comprehend.


Sunday, June 21, 2020

“Pilgrimage with Mother Mary”


Journey in responding to God’s call without Mother Mary’s accompaniment leads to emptiness and vain. Of course, Mother Mary doesn’t take the place of the Holy Spirit, but she helps me, forms me, protects me, and guides me to follow Her Son’s footsteps. I could say that without Mother Mary I might not able to be so far as who am I now in this pilgrimage of this life. I believe that she always helps me a lot by her intercessions me her poor child in responding to God’s special call. She has an important role in my life. 

While I was small, my parents and school teachers forced me to participate in Marian Devotions likes recitation of the Rosary in the small Christian Community. Just simply I attended without understanding what is it? Those practices in childhood simply I did without grasping the meaning them. The Marian Spirituality in myself started to grow in Novitiate, especially after having class or presentation about Mother Mary in the Claretian Congregation, particularly the topic of ‘The Immaculate Heart of Mary’, which Claretian adopts its Cordimarian Sonship. 

Mother Mary’s heart is special for me to reflect about love for God and human beings. Mary who formed Jesus physically by the love and pure blood of her heart also forms me to become a missionary who may able to proclaim the Kingdom of God for the transformation of the world. That my personal devotion is always be done in a meaningful manner to be closer to her and as one of the means to grow in this vocation to love God and neighbour in and through the Claretian Congregation. 

Mother Mary as the chosen one of God the Father to bear Jesus Christ in this world is an example for all of us the Christians in our pilgrimage as God’s people. She had many good qualities or values to be followed. For me personally, I emphasize it into faith/obedience, tenderness and loyalty. Though there are many good qualities other than these three, but these are the three main qualities which touch me personally in reflecting about Mother Mary. 

a. Obedience 

“I am the handmaid of the Lord, let it be done according to your will” (Luke 1:38)

In this annunciation statement, I understand her deep faith and it expressed in the attitudes of humility, listening, dialoguing, accepting and obeying to God’ s Divine plan. Her ‘yes’ to God through Angel Gabriel shows that she expressed her faith and self-surrender to God’s will. It is the starting point of her life as the Mother of Jesus Christ the Son and Redeemer of the world.

She accepted the will of God, even though she knew that she had to journey through many challenges because of the social custom existed at that time, that she would be condemned and stoned to death for she conceives before her marriage ties, but still she accepted it.

Mother Mary’s obedience helps me to see my Christian vocation to grow faith in God that is the key to my vocation. By obeying to God’s will, I am able to set my life by the grace of the Holy Spirit. As a Christian I am called to live out my vocation to bring the Kingdom of God: hope, peace, justice, Love, joy, harmony etc., for the transformation of the world into God’s love. 

b. Tenderness 

“They have no wine” (Jn2:4). 

This action of Mary indicates that she always looks at everyone with mercy and compassion to those who are in need especially neglected and abandoned ones. Mary was not asked to help the master of that feast but she couldn’t bear or deny her maternal love, compassion and mercy towards others. She felt that the suffering of others also was her, too. She is connected with society. 

Humility helps her to please God, so her tender love helps her to please or connect with society. Through her, I can come to her Son, Jesus Christ that her Son never let His mother’s hope goes in vain. 

Mary’s response the ‘tender love’ to the need of the people at the wedding at Cana helps me to see my inner self that I am a social being who naturally need others and who is always related to the society. As a Christian, I am for everyone that the needs or feelings of others are mines, too. So, I need to be touched by heart to help, share hope, joy, love and also sorrows in solidarity with others in God’s grace. 

c. Fidelity/loyalty 

“Near the Cross of Jesus, stood His mother……” (John 19:25) 

True love is showed through fidelity either in joy or sorrow situation, even though the person doesn’t understand the situation, but has hope that God’s love is sure. Mary at the foot of Jesus on the Cross shows she is the mother of all either in joy or sorrow. Even she at the moment of undergoing death spiritually/psychologically, but I believe that she had hope and faith to the mystery of the Love of God. That God would give/had prepared a wonderful mystery behind the suffering. 

Mary’s fidelity to God helps me to see my life (faith to God) in any situation. Life is hard but GOD is good. God’s love is always be with us. The only thing is how I am able to be in His presence for the transformation of the world to God’s Will. 

#In Corde Matris 
Stu. Domi Lanang, CMF 

Sunday, May 3, 2020

“He asked me whether I would be so good as to hear his confession”

“He asked me whether I would be so good as to hear his confession”St. Claret’s Autobiography-319

Confession is very necessary for all the Christians who believe in the forgiveness of God almighty. From the time we as Christians prepare ourselves to receive the Eucharistic Lord for the first time into our hearts, we begin to surrender totally to God asking forgiveness to our sins. In the case of Claretian living last few years, I have experienced the importance given to confession at least once a month help the individuals to be relieved from sins and to regain the joy of being Christian. In this 2020s in my overall understanding, confession has lost its importance. There are differences among Christians; there are people questioning themselves whether confession gives us total peace? Or does really forgiveness come from confession? There are some halfhearted, confessing for some failures and not revealing the whole self to the priest out of unreliability on priests. There are some who were baptized and forgotten that they are Christians because of worldly involvements. Amidst these confusing society How a Claretian would move forward in his vocation to save souls from sins and to bring glory to God by making the Christians to have trust on forgiveness of God through the sacrament of reconciliation? Fr. Claret in his autobiography number 85 says “always made my weekly confession” and so, it is an invitation for all Claretians to reconcile with oneself and with others. At the same time, we read in Fr. Claret’s autobiography number 180 “I was so busy hearing confessions” this symbolizes that we must also be the instruments of peace to others. Either as a Claretian priest, deacon, student or lay all of us have the necessary responsibility to invite Christians, who live with us, for peace and reconciliation with themselves and with others through the sacrament of confession.

A friend of mine one day he said that he confessed all his sins and only one sin that he could not confess and that he would confess later with a priest whom he will not meet in his lifetime. In return, I asked him why you want to choose a priest whom you would not see anymore. “I don’t believe -he said- the native priest who will be around the country and with them after confessing cannot move closely because they are not reliable”.
Based on this experience I was reflecting about our founder Fr. Claret. How much he would have been a person of reliability, so many hours he spent in hearing confession it was all for the peace among people. In the autobiography of Claret numbers 827-830, we read the best confession experiences of Claret. What does all these examples from the life of Claret has to say to us? We as Claretians called to save the souls of our fellow brothers and sisters in our communities as well as in the society; we are called to be aware of the state of being lost. Let’s share our life experience which brought and still bringing peace by the forgiveness of Christ in the sacrament of confession. The only peace we have in our hearts is alive because of the continuous forgiveness of God. Every time we go astray without holding Jesus’ hands; he embraces us through only act we make with him by reconciliation. The only example we can give to the world is our personal life. Keep growing in the faith of the Lord out of His forgiving mercy.

Br. Kingsley Suresh Patrick CMF

The wonders and challenges of the Nanotechnology and the Geoengineering for our planet


We as humans are in a crossroad, where many alternatives or proposals in the scientific and technological world are the unavoidable part of human life. “Technoscience, when well directed, can produce important means of improving the quality of human life, …” and preservation of the environment. However, “never has humanity had such power over itself, yet nothing ensures that it will be used wisely, particularly when we consider how it is currently being used.” The question is “in whose hands does all this power lie, or will it eventually end up?” (LS 103). Throughout of this short work, we are going to approach to two, among so many, technoscience achievements: nanotechnology and geoengineering, some of them we are already having in our hands through a variety of technological devices or gadgets. It is important to analyze the pro and counterparts of them, and finally, to reflect on our Christian faith response to.

Nanotechnology.
Nanotechnology is an art and science of manipulating material on the manometric size scale. Dimensions between approximately 1 and 100 nanometers are known as the nanoscale (nm). It is like domesticating the atoms and molecules according to our needs. The ideas of nanoscience and nanotechnology started with a talk entitled “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom” by physicist Richard Feynman at an American Physical Society meeting at the California Institute of Technology (CalTech) on December 29, 1959. The term was coined in 1974 by Norio Taniguchi of Tokyo Science University to describe semiconductor processes such as thin-film deposition that deal with control on the order of nanometers. His definition still stands as the basic statement today: “Nano-technology mainly consists of the processing of separation, consolidation, and deformation of materials by one atom or one molecule.”

The main benefits, so far, considered from nanotechnology are: it may help to obtain, storing and use of energy more efficiently; improving the electronic and computing system allowing to construct circuits in very accurately on an atomic level; its potential is major in the medical area: Nanobots could be sent into a patient's arteries to clear away blockages; surgeries could become much faster and more accurate; injuries could be repaired cell-by-cell; it can make possible to heal genetic conditions by fixing the damaged genes, etc.

Nonetheless, as any misused technology, nanotechnology might contain a real threat for example for environmental effects in the future as potential new toxins and pollutants, however, L. Boff has a positive approach, who considered that nanotechnology can help us to transform the  very pollutant elements that are damaging our environment and also to produce goods to overcome poverty. The negative effects can be seen also in economic issues where nanotechnology can be placed in the hands of a few specialized companies and producing unemployment. Perhaps the main concern on this technology is about privacy and security like producing microscopic and detectable recording devices that can be injected in the human body and to get computerizing control; weaponizing it like smart bullets, atomic and novel weapons that can fall in the wrong hands, etc.

Geoengineering.
 “Geoengineering is the deliberate large-scale in the Earth’s oceans, soil and atmosphere natural systems to counteract the effects of climate change temporarily” (Fred Pierce, 2019). The initiatives in this field came out of American researchers in 1960s suggested floating billions of white objects such as golf balls on the oceans to reflect sunlight. In 1977, Cesare Marchetti of the Austria-based International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis discussed ways of catching all of Europe’s CO2 emissions and injecting them into sinking Atlantic Ocean currents. In 1982, Soviet scientist Mikhail Budyko proposed filling the stratosphere with sulphate particles to reflect sunlight back into space. The first experiments o test the idea of fertilizing the oceans with iron to stimulate the growth of CO2-absorbing algae were carried out by British researchers in 1995. Now, this technique is a strong scientific proposal in the International Climate Change meetings to be accepted by multilateral organisms like UN.

According to the Geoengineering Monitor project of Biofuelwatch and ETC Group, the geoengineering proposals are:

·      
Solar radiation management: SRM techniques attempt to reflect sunlight back into space and include a range of ideas, from orbiting mirrors, tonnes of sulphates sprayed into the stratosphere, and modifying clouds, plants and ice to make them more reflect more sunlight.
·       Carbon dioxide removal: These proposals posit that it’s possible to suck carbon out of the atmosphere on a massive scale, using a combination of biological and mechanical methods, from seeding the ocean with iron pellets to create plankton blooms to creating forests of mechanical “artificial trees”.
·       Earth radiation management: ERM proponents suggest that the negative effects of climate change can be offset by allowing heat to escape into space -for example, by thinning cirrus clouds.

So far, there is strong resistance to the implementation of Geoengineering because is a false and an external solution to the climate crisis that aims to address the symptoms of climate change but ignores and enables the root causes to continue. Here are some of the key reasons to oppose geoengineering:

·       None of the technologies have a track record, all of them come with major risks and unknowns, and in some cases, the effects would be obviously catastrophic.
·       Weaponization: Computer models show that geoengineering interventions can have regional winners and losers; to the extent that geoengineering successfully changes climate patterns in a predictable way, it will inevitably be weaponized.
·       Detracts from real solution: By promising a quick fix, geoengineering threatens to delay the implementation of a transition away from fossil fuels and could redirect funding and investments away from real climate solutions. Some geoengineering proposals require vast amounts of energy, which means less climate-friendly energy for everyone else.
·       Risk for human rights and biodiversity: Many geoengineering proposals require the intensive exploitation of vast amounts of land. Those projects would inevitably displace millions of people and potentially wipe out entire ecosystems.
·       Favoured by the global north, backed by billionaires: Most of the political and financial support for geoengineering comes from a small group of elite engineers, a handful of billionaires like Bill Gates, fusil oil corporations and a growing group of right-wing politicians

So, this global palliative proposal seems to be a “High-risk technofixes are proposed so that some can survive while preserving their privileges, even if it implies a whole series of new environmental and social threats for millions of other people” (John Leo, 2019).
If we review the stand of the church, it has always had some precautious even fearful approach to science and technology, for example, the all anathema sits of Pope Pius IX against science in December 21, 1863. Fortunately, since Second Vatican Council, the church changed its view towards the modern world and its technoscience’s advances. Nowadays, we are called to see everything with the eyes of faith or critical mind and heart so that we may not swallow anything but to have a piece of proper knowledge, analysis and decisions, because “any technical solutions which science claims to offer will be powerless to solve the serious problems of our world if humanity loses its compass if we lose sight of the great motivations which make it possible for us to live in harmony…” (LS 200).

Whatever the technoscience is discovering has already been in the richness and potentiality of nature. The main challenge is how we humans use what we discovered; here, the role of ethical principles has to play much. All signs and new discoveries should guide us to our main goal the joyful life or integral and integrated life with the creational community. The mystic Willigis Jager (2018, 26, 64) keenly points “The future humanity will be mystic, …I believe that the XXI century is a century for metaphysics and its propulsors will not be philosophers and theologian but scientists, because they are who aiming to a reality which may not be demonstrated: God”. The wonders of science and technology should help us sharpen our faith in God.

Bibliographical reference.

Boff, Leonardo & Hathaway, Mark (2014). El tao de la liberacion: una ecologia de la transformacion. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.

Geoengineering Monitor project of Biofuelwatch and ETC Group. http://www.geoengineeringmonitor.org

Jager, Willigis (2018). La ola es el mar: espiritualidad mistica, Titivillus, PDF.
Leo, John (2019). Geoengineering ‘false solution to climate crisis’. http://www.geoengineeringmonitor.org/2019/11/geoengineering-false-solution-to-climate-crisis/

Pearce, Fred (2019). Geoengineer the planet? More scientists now say it must be an option. https://e360.yale.edu/features/geoengineer-the-planet-more-scientists-now-say-it-must-be-an-option

Pope Pius IX. The Syllabus.

Pope Francis (2015). Laudato Si, Vatican.

Fr. Efrain Vasquez Mamani, cmf.

Thursday, April 2, 2020

A GOING FORTH EXPERIENCE



Ucchimunai, Kalpity, Sri Lanka is a beautiful peninsula with a very narrow attachment to the main land without any roads leading in or out of it essentially making it an island. The main occupation of the people is fishing. The islanders live a very simple life. My novitiate batch and I went to Ucchimunai during Holy Week for an exposure experience.
            There were many activities we organized along with the people, such as: praying the Rosary, Adoration, Holy Mass, English classes, playing card games, sports activities such as volleyball, and watching movies. We also had ecological activities such as picking up litter from the beach, helping the fishermen to clean their nets, and house visiting.
One challenge that I came across during my stay was to move past my shyness to be among the people. As a missionary, I should use all means possible to make God’s Word reaches the people. Each difficulty has its own grace for life. I thank God for giving me the grace to overcome my challenge so that I could go and do house visits.

The purpose of the house visits was to get to know the people better, to hear their stories.  We were divided into three small groups and we spread out across the different zones of the village to make sure that we did not miss anyone who would like a visit. This was the most memorable part of my stay at Ucchimunai because we were able to hear about the issues and struggles the people deal with on a daily basis. We ended each house visit with a short prayer for the family. I am certain that our house visits brought hope and courage to those who were facing difficulties or challenges in their life. I learned many things which are important for my Claretian vocation. The house visits were my “going forth” experience of being sent out to the peripheries.

“Going forth”: An important action for a missionary
            The term “Going Forth” is consists of two words: go and forth. Go (verb): to move or travel from one place to another, and forth (adverb): away from a place; out; towards a place. (Cf. Oxford Dictionary new eight editions). “Going forth” means to go out from one place towards another place. It is an act of going out.

Then Jesus called the twelve disciples and gave them power and authority… and He sent them to proclaim the kingdom of God and to heal the sick… So they set out and went through the villages, proclaiming the good news and healing the people everywhere (Cf. Luke 9:1ff).
            The Father sent His Son to earth, and the Son, in turn, sends His disciples to the peripheries to proclaim The Kingdom of God and heal the sick. In this Gospel passage, we see how the disciples went through the villages. They met the people and did what Jesus had told them. That was a “going forth” experience for them. Without going forth, we will not be able to experience the life of the people in every corner of the world. It is an essential thing that a missionary should have in doing the mission of God.
            In order to face the many challenges of evangelization in today’s world, “the Church has proposed to serve the kingdom as a ‘Church going forth’ towards the human peripheries: accompanying the life of the poor, inserting herself into their lives and trying to understand the soul of each people, recognizing in them the signs of the presence of God, creating bridges and opportunities of the encounter between the Gospel and all cultures” (Cf. Witnesses and Messengers of the Joy of the Gospel, Declaration of the XXV General Chapter of Claretian Congregation, No. 19).

            Going forth is very important for servants of God. Missionaries are required to put it into practice in their daily life. A missionary should be ready to accept God’s invitation to leave their comfort zone and to go out to proclaim God’s Good News to all creation. Every religious is personally sent to proclaim the Good News through their life promoting communion and the mutual belonging to Christ (Cf. VC 72-73). Our God is a God who moves towards His people.

Br. Ram Busa Paga, CMF
Philosophy - I


Tuesday, March 24, 2020

A Fragrance Tray for Covid-19


The echo of Bees is heard to the flower
Flower of us the human race
The rolling stone is touching us
Screening our Salomon heads


Technology and science brand us
We the flower crown as the star in this world
We run on the race
The track on the flower of human, human, human

You other creations are nothing
Our race is vital in this world
As the pianist plays a melody
We are the Amazon, not you other creatures


Oh Covid-19 a small rolling stones
You choke us Screenshot our fragility
The nothingness of us
Pluck down to the panic we are

You, you small tiny Covid-19 watch us
We all are in our nest of still
But then again ‘do you think we are panic?’
We are frightened because of you?

You might proud at this time
We are in the honey of our flower
But consider that we want to make fun of you
We are in our nest of production


That you are searching of us
We are looking at you
Some new green leaves are coming
The time of Sunshine is closer


You covid-19 we offer our shining and aromatic gratitude  
You bring the new branch for us
Branch of Solidarity to the entire of our race
That the blossom flower of us need to be cared


Covid-19 we offer you our hands full of beautiful seen
You monitor us, light out of our fragility
We after you will not let dry the blossom of us
It is only a new page for us for holding hands

Though you have dried some blossom of the flowers
You are not the last
You have brought them written to the final of theirs and our strong faith
The Hope of Being with Our Divine, the Almighty Lord.





Stu. Domii Lanang, CMF
‘In the Corner of 69’