Search This Blog

Saturday, November 28, 2020

SHIFTS IN BRAIN DRAIN IN THE 21ST CENTURY

The skyrocketing demand and shortages in professional fields today can be attributed to the inordinate desire by developed countries to boost their professional fields, innovations and productivity. This has perhaps dimmed technological and professional advancement thereby depriving underdeveloped countries steady progress. Such a practice is technically referred to as Brain Drain. In a succinct way, Brain Drain is the emigration or flux of the smartest, educated people, scientists and technocrats from their native countries to work abroad motivated by promising high salary provisions and job security.

In 2000 almost 175 million people: approximately 2.9% of the world’s population was said to be outside their countries of birth for work (Maureen Gitate: 2013, 23). This “Human Capital Flight” poses a threat to the progress of countries which lose human resources, rich technical skills or knowledge. It has increased disparities in the economic and social prospects of countries across the world. The rich and developed countries on the contrary, grow richer and prosperous at the expense of developing countries which continue to stagger or stay backward. The disadvantageous part of brain drain in this millennium is felt in the economic costs which particular developing countries incur in training or educational funding of the future emigrant-skilled personnel who fail to do justice to the resources invested in their education by their native countries. Thus the countries which experience the drain of skilled resources face the getaway of financial capital and in turn, the GDP of developing countries keep fluctuating due to outflow of skilled human capital reciprocated with inflow of hired personnel in governments’ effort to replace the flown human capital.


Of recent, we have globally experienced new shifts in the problem. The once held outcry in various third world countries about theoretical studies with their inability to produce self-sustaining and job creating entrepreneurs has aggravated the menace of unemployment. It’s on record today that the lack of prior knowledge of the employer in a given labor market will tantamount into long years of unemployment. Moreover, in some places, it necessitates a job seeker to offer a bribe to attain a job, yet the female due to the lack of working ethics, the male employers have victimized the women turning them into objects of sexual gratification for their lust.

Technocrats on the other hand, being deprived of proper working environment, low salary enumeration, sabotage of their research and innovations, pressure and poor working conditions, many have resorted to fleeing their native countries in search for greener pastures. They have perfectly done well in various fields abroad. As incentives for work, their salaries are ever increased and both insurance and assurance are incontestable wherever they are.

The 21st century with its provisions has created a shift in the traditional conception of brain drain. Today we hear less of skilled personnel fleeing their countries. Companies in developed countries, taking advantage of the creeping economies of poor nations, have advertised demand for casual workers. The most heartbreaking fact of this is that poor people sell off their precious properties to secure a contract for two or more years hoping to elevate their economic standards. Many even after the sale, they still fail to secure a contract yet those who get such contracts work in dehumanizing conditions characterized by long hours of work, low payments, mistreatment, sexual harassment for the females and to the extreme, some have culminated into death due to the work load which is not in extension to their bodily strain or murdered by their employers. Thus I no longer consider “Brain Drain,” but rather; “Strain Drain”- a modern form of slavery.

Due to the heavy yoke laid upon humanity in this century, it’s no longer a problem to be dealt by individuals alone. There is a need for collective consciousness to remedy the situation. The individualistic, capitalistic and egoistic tendencies for personal enrichment at the expense of others need to be wiped out.

We need to remember that the existential inability of the other person to pursuit his living in a humanized manner simultaneously depict our spiritual immaturity. We mirror each other! Egoism which lure us into inhibiting our true selves is but for a little while. All religions therefore, ought to awaken the ethical and moral integrity of persons in their exhortations.

Owing to the globalism of the challenges brought about by brain drain and strain drain, particular countries ought to alleviate and nurse the situation. In the first place, education system which is predominately theoretical in nature need to be revised and more emphasis given to practical skills to equip nationals with skills of self-sustenance through job creation. Secondly, governments should strongly offer checks and balances in various sectors to mitigate against corruption and its manifestations. Finally governments should develop centers for scientific research and high tech entrepreneurship together with tax holidays for local entrepreneurs as a way of encouraging influx of national working abroad to invest in the economic and technological advancements of their nations.

 

Thursday, November 19, 2020

TRANSFORMING SUBJECTIVISM INTO OBJECTIVISM: A NEW LOOK ABOUT THE SELF

    Pope Francis in his Post-Synodal Exhortation Christus Vivit says: “often in life, we waste time asking ourselves ‘who I am?’ You can keep asking, ‘whoam I?’ for the rest of your life. But the real question is ‘for whom am I?”(Christus Vivit. 286). In this particular article: 286, the pope implicitly invites the entire People of God to have a new look at the “self.” Humanly speaking, the purposes of human existence is to build a good relationship with other human beings and helping others in various aspect of life towards an authentic attainment of the goal of life. In other words that there is a need for transformation from subjectivism to objectivism. 
     But first of all, what is subjectivism and objectivism? Before going any further, it’s right and just first of all understand the terminologies used to give a better understanding of the discretion entirely. Subjectivism and objectivism are actually the philosophical concepts though in this modern time due to lack of the proper understanding of whatever is entailed in them, problems more than solutions have arisen. Subjectivism in the first place is the doctrine that all knowledge is limited to experiences by the self, and that transcendent knowledge is impossible. Such a mentality hinder the reception of other ideas or exhortations from other people, which to the psychologists it’s termed as “wild ego” (Sigmund Freud; 1923, 56). 
     On the other hand is its opposite that is Objectivism. This theory is in contrast with the theory of subjectivism. It is the philosophical doctrine which emphasizes the belief that certain things, especially moral truths, exist independently of human knowledge or perception of them (Richard Bernstein; 1983, 8). It goes beyond the nose perception, that is looking at things one’s own way but through the openness of the mind to various reflections beyond the self. Hence, it does not take the presence of other realities for granted. So, this theory recognizes and values the existence of other beings. The famous saying “I am because you are” (Ubuntu: African Philosophy), will suit this theory. This theory is very important for human life because it focuses on a “beyond-oneself”. The importance of objectivism will be really felt in life, when the theory does not remain as a philosophical notion as such. It means there must be an application part taken by every human being. The theory will not bring positive impacts for life, unless it is being practiced. And this requires fully human understanding that objectivism yields great knowledge if we deeply contemplation about self and its relation to the truth. In fact, subjectivism has been dominating objectivism. This domination is clearly seen in today’s world, where human beings give more priority to individualism, egoism and selfishness.
    The world in which we live is one where everyone is for his own interests and this makes it a broken world; it is a broken world because it is characterized by instability, crime, war and ethnic intolerance which will prevent the world from developing or making progress (Gabriel Marcel: 1913). One of the reason sthat causes these unwanted events which stated by Gabriel Marcel is the subjectivism that some people still hold. They only think about themselves. In responding to those problems, Gabriel Marcel suggested to us to have a deep reflection about the being and open up to each other through communication and communion. 


    A relationship which is built by a communication and communion is really needed today. It shows the very nature of human that is social being. A good communion and an effective communication will also surely help every human being to have a good life. It brings people to a right understanding about the self. The self that is not selfishness or egoism. But a magnanimousness towards others: Being available for others. Therefore, transforming subjectivism into objectivism is necessary to be put into practice. Looking at today’s reality where there are many sufferings, poverty, and slavery, and dehumanizing relationships. Humanity is demanded to have a new way of understanding about self. It is to move from asking ‘who am I?’ which is ontological to a real question eschatological and existential question of ‘for whom am I?’ As the Christian family, it is essential for us to continue reflecting on the invitation of Pope Francis in his exhortation Christus Vivit article 286. It is an invitation that will definitely bring a big transformation for oneself and even the world in general.

Sunday, November 8, 2020

GOD IN THE MIDST OF SUFFERING

 In this modern world we are too busy. If a beggar asks for any alms we place some money and escape from the situation as early as possible. We don’t think why he or she struggles, what makes him or her to beg. We don’t find whether there are any other ways to help the person in need than dropping some money or giving some things to satiate their hunger or thirst. Moreover due to the Covid-19 pandemic panics and worries have affected indiscriminately both the rich and poor in same manner. All are quarantined in the four walls of their residents. 

 

A while past, I was put to task by friends of mine who pestered me with a traditional philosophical query of the Existence of God. One seemed to be affluent in strong arguments against God’s existence whereas another on the contrary, argued in defense of God’s existence as he said; ‘My God is a loving God, a caring God, and non-punishing God. Actually the second person is not educated or learned, but an enlightened ordinary faithful Christian. I was taken up while listening to it. So a question appeared in my mind: how are we to talk about God at this time of global suffering. This focus is very fruitful one to express the faith in the existence of God. 

The study of Theology talks about God, it says God is a Mystery and thus beyond our comprehension. St. Thomas Aquinas a great Theologian would state in his Summa Theologiae that “we cannot know what God is, but only what is not.” It is understood that the suffering is a massive reality and inevitable, but crucial to be more prudent while responding to the disquieting situations. In the Bible, we find Job who never wavered in his faith. He was with all the material facilities, comforts, and properties and had a good family leading a happy life. But due to the test, one after the other: his dear ones distanced from him and all his material possessions were taken away from him. He however at the moment of unjust suffering kept his head on the side of God, witnessed God alone saying, God has given, He has taken up ( Jb.1.21). 

The basic entry points for our situational reflection should be; how are we talking about God who is revealed as love? How are we proclaiming God of Life to men and women who die daily and everyday due to this COVID-19 globally? How do we approach and respect the people who are affected with this pandemic? These are some of the existential questions appearing in my heart thinking of God in the time of suffering.  

The Church is our mother who teaches the Christian faith. Theologically speaking it is the sacrament of Christ. Saint Augustine puts it in a very reflective way which suites our adherence to the Church as spiritual home and heritage, he contends; “He who does not have the church as his mother does not have God as his Father.” Our Catholic Church asserts our identity as Christian. We Christians are called to live in love and fraternity. In a situation like today we need to manifest the compassionate and merciful love of God. Pope Francis shows his compassionate heart to the world, with various gestures of love including praying to Mother Mary and Eucharistic Lord to bring an end to this suffering. He is asking the Christians to pray to God for the expiration of COVID-19 and solicits solidarity with the suffering people. 

As Jesus moved towards the people with compassion, thereby, healing them, strengthening them in the time of fear, he similarly hears the grieving of the many now. There are many compassionate people at the service, sacrificing their days and nights for the good of the others. We need to express our compassionate hearts wherever we are, because when we show compassion to others we show the compassionate love of God and tell the world that God continues to love hence, giving true witness to His existence in world which many have failed to comprehend.